Folly and Royal Self-Entitlement Ruined Andrew, and It Might Persist Yet
It all began with a solitary photograph, perhaps the most impactful ever captured of a individual from the royal household.
There stood the Earl of Inverness, standing closely beside a young woman, while an associate smiled suggestively in the backdrop.
Lacking that photograph, captured at a party in 2001, it would have been difficult to accept the assertions of a young woman who stated she was moved across the sea and compelled to have brief relations with a member of the monarchy?
An odd, revealing move by someone who had openly asserted to have never heard of her, said he could never have had sex with her, and yet provided a substantial sum of monarchical resources to avert a drawn-out legal case.
A Long Period of Controversy
In this context, talk of the monarchy acting swiftly to distance themselves from Andrew are inaccurate. This affair has endured for the majority of 15 years since that image, and an additional snapshot of Andrew ambling pleasantly with a notorious individual surfaced.
- Arrogance: For what duration did his siblings, possibly even his relatives, realize that Andrew was so self-entitled?
- Dubious Friendships: They must have realized, if his aides and the authorities were fulfilling their roles, that he had some highly questionable associates given he publicly hosted them to estates.
- Fiscal Irresponsibility: If the monarchy did not know about his intimate behaviors, they certainly knew about his overspending with public money.
Travel were documented in public records: private aircraft transfers from the palace to a golf course and back again in time for midday meal, exclusive air travel instead of commercial flights, all for the comfort of "Airmiles Andy".
Existence of Entitlement
Additionally the presumption which required subservience when he walked into a room or the supreme consciousness about his honorifics used on his correspondence in letters to his friends.
He avoided accountability while his matriarch, who strangely indulged him, was still living. The Queen did at least remove him of public duties and honorary colonelcies in the wake of his catastrophic and, it is now clear, untruthful media appearance six years ago.
Recent Developments
It was only in the last 14 days that events accelerated, following the publication of biographical works giving more disturbing particulars of his actions and that of his connections.
Additional revelations have again exposed Andrew's thinking that he could escape being untruthful about his contact with a disgraced individual.
Society (and the press) were far more perceptive of the monarchy. There was nobody of any consequence to defend him, a result of all those years of presumption.
Royal Worries
The more astute royals recognized that. The key objective is to pass on the monarchy, if not as previously at least whole and untarnished.
For generations the last 190 years trying to reverse the image of earlier rulers, demonstrating they are valuable, dutiful and attentive to their people.
Andrew was putting all that in danger in an time when submission and discretion is no longer enough.
Aftermath
Eventually, the notoriously uncertain king was prodded further. There was no other option. The royal household had surrendered command of the narrative.
Currently the removal of titles and the persistent and lifetime social disgrace that will afflict Andrew most severely.
- Reduction: Reduced to just a private citizen
- Past Example: The first royal to surrender his designations in recent history
- Naval Career: Notably hurtful given his service in the conflict
He continues to be a royal advisor, in principle able to substitute for the sovereign, and he is still in the succession to the crown, but none of these will ever occur.
What Lies Ahead
Do individuals he encounters still defer to him? Could they still make mistakes and call him Prince? Will they even say Mr,
Of course, he is not retiring to an ordinary town, but to the royal family's extensive grounds at a royal residence.
There, he will be furnished by the sovereign with one of the royal residences and given some sort of personal stipend.
It is not his prior accommodation, where he paid a token payment for more than 20 years, and the area is a bit far, but even so it may not be far enough.
Pending Matters
This is not over. There are still records in the custody of overseas authorities to be revealed.
- Political Pressure: Will parliament request additional information
- Financial Investigation: Or investigate the improper use of taxpayer funds
- Judicial Potential: There may even be a criminal probe into his conduct
Perhaps for the moment the reputational impact to the institution is limited. The narrative from the royal household was clearly that the stripping of designations was what the king, and particularly other senior monarchical figures, desired.
A Shift in Position
An end to deception that Andrew was doing it voluntarily. And, notably, the concise statement showed clearly that the royals were aligning with the complainant's account of occurrences.
Even more, for the first time they eventually showed concern for the victims: "The censures are judged required, regardless of the truth that he persists in refuting the claims against him."
In the end it is presumption, self-seeking and inactivity that will destroy the monarchy. In his folly, self-gratification and greed, Andrew appears never to have understood that truth.