🔗 Share this article

Australia's decisive move to restrict social media access for those under 16 is sparking debate internationally. Politicians, safety advocates, and families are observing intently to see if this strategy will become a template for other nations.

The European Movement

Throughout Europe, a rising group of states are exploring similar restrictions.

• Denmark plans a ban on social media for youth below 15, with the PM stating that phones and apps are "taking away our youngsters' innocence". Legislation is expected to be formalized in the coming year.
• Norway is planning to implement a access barrier of 15, highlighting the need to shield young people from the "influence of the AI".
• The Irish government is working on a digital ID system to authenticate the identity and age of social media account holders. The media minister have suggested that an similar ban remains "a potential options on the table".
• In The Spanish government, the prime minister has called on parliament to pass a proposal increasing the minimum age for using social media to 16.
• In France, the president has proposed a ban for children below 15, and a legislative committee has recommended a similar move, alongside an overnight "digital curfew" for adolescents.
• The administration in The Netherlands has urged families to restrict their youngsters from social media before 15.

At the EU level, the bloc's legislature has adopted a non-binding statement demanding a ban for minors except if a parent decides otherwise is granted. Even though it highlights of the "compulsive" nature of these platforms, the move does not enact mandatory rules.

"A clear age limit is a useful starting point," commented a leading parliamentarian driving the resolution.

Britain: A Cautious Eye

For the United Kingdom, the government has kept open a potential ban, arguing that "no measure is discarded" but maintaining any decision must be "supported by conclusive evidence".

Last year, support grew behind a proposal to impose controls on social media use by under-16s, but it was eventually weakened. Instead, the administration vowed to further research the topic.

Campaign organizations have raised warnings. An organization established by the family of a girl who took her own life after being exposed to dangerous social media material contends that a blanket age ban might not protect children and could create a "sudden drop-off" of exposure when teens become eligible.

"This ban is a reaction to the refusal of the social media companies to build platforms and apps that are secure and fit for young users," stated a leading online safety campaigner.

America: A State-by-State Picture

In the United States, legislation is largely happening at the local government level due to federal inaction.

• The state of Utah requires parental consent for under-18s to use social media and restricts overnight use.
• The state of Florida has signed a measure prohibiting those below 14 from joining social media, though it is entangled in court battles.
• The state of Virginia has passed a rule limiting under-16s to 60 minutes of social media access per day, with extra use requiring parental permission.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and The state of Louisiana have likewise enacted measures demanding parental consent for under-16s to set up social media presences.

Even with cross-party agreement and calls from various individuals to mimic this lead, a nationwide ban is presently seen as improbable.

International Perspectives

Beyond Europe and the US, other states are likewise exploring options.

• Malaysia plans to ban social media for those under sixteen effective next year.
• The Brazilian authorities has raised the access age for Instagram to 16.

But, global bodies strike a more measured tone. The UN children's agency has cautioned that age-based restrictions carry risks and "may even have unintended consequences". The agency highlights that the internet can be a "lifeline" for vulnerable young people and that regulation should not be a "excuse" for social media firms to prioritize safety.

As this international discussion continues, the actions of the Australian government and several other countries show that governments internationally are increasingly content to wait for tech companies to make changes on their own.