🔗 Share this article

"A significant portion of my personal history is stored on Snapchat, and unexpectedly they want us to cover the cost for it."

One-star feedback and a feeling of injustice have dominated digital forums since Snapchat became the latest technology company to start charging for a service that people previously enjoyed using for without payment.

The company behind Snapchat revealed in September that it would start charging people if they have more than five GB of previously shared photos and videos stored as Memories.

In the eyes of countless individuals, these retro posts act as a window to the past – leading some to criticize the company of "money-hungry tactics" in posts on social media and unfavorable feedback on mobile app marketplaces.

Alternative Options

The company has equated its subscription options to those provided by major companies for mobile devices.

And as an alternative for users unwilling to subscribe, users may save their saved content – which for some span large volumes – to their personal gadget.

The company indicated that only a minority of users would be impacted by the new policy.

The company admitted that it was "inherently difficult to shift from using a feature without cost to paying for it" – but suggested it would be "a valuable investment" for members.

A significant number of opposing the decision on the internet appear unconvinced.

Widespread Discontent

A web-based protest labeled the cost a "archival levy", with commenters describing it "Orwellian" and "outrageous" – while an individual promised never to use the application again.

Meanwhile, in a negative evaluation on the app marketplace, a person named an online commenter said it felt "deeply unfair".

"If I know millennials right, many people have extensive archives of personal moments on the platform," they commented. "The vast majority only remained on the platform primarily for that reason. 5GB is absolutely nothing when you have years worth of moments... Bye Snap."

And, a London-based user, a 20-year-old aspiring reporter in the UK capital, shared on a social network her plans to remove the platform.

"I concluded that I needed to download all my archived media as soon as I could," she mentioned. "Almost all of my youth have been documented through my Snapchat memories, all of the pictures in there are really important to me."

"It just doesn't make sense to demand payment users for something that has been complimentary for a considerable period."

Uncertain Costs

The platform has yet to announce how much subscription tiers would cost in the Britain – only that they are part of a "slow worldwide introduction".

But 23-year-old another user, who also lives in the capital, stated in a post on the social platform that she would be "upset" by these fees.

Amber mentioned that the app had become "a regular habit" since she first joined in 2014.

Although she acknowledged she recognized the app needed to make money, Amber proposed that the Memories feature is more valuable than the company may have understood.

"In my opinion it's a rather unjust step to charge your customers who have been faithful and dedicated," she explained. "These aren't just called Memories, these are our genuine personal moments."

Industry Perspective

Businesses choosing to require payment from subscribers for a feature that was once complimentary is nothing new, and numerous people subscribe to services like iCloud and Google Drive to preserve their media content from their mobile device.

The reality of storing data in the cloud – which some in the digital field frequently call as merely "an external server" – is that it involves expenses.

"Storing trillions of archived media on Snapchat requires significant resources," online expert Matt Navarra commented. "The platform has to try to find a way to cover the cost of archiving, bandwidth, copies, file sharing, data protection – all that stuff."

Yet the consultant noted that requiring payment for a feature that had once been complimentary, and users had been prompted to utilize as such, may appear as a "misleading tactic" for certain individuals.

"Changing the rules after individuals have built this extensive stored content feels inappropriate," he said. In the view of countless individuals, he stated, "Archived media exceeds mere information, they're sentimental records."

The sentiment was reflected by those posting unfavorable comments, with a user describing their archived media "extremely valuable to me".

"The stored media includes all elements of my life within them from celebrations of new family members' births, grieving for lost relatives, memories with friends/family, [and] my whole teenage years," they expressed.

Research Perspective

An academic expert, a university scholar at an educational establishment in the Netherlands, said that Snapchat's move shows the consequences of commercial platforms being used to store sentimental personal content.

"Platforms gain from this confidence, interdependence, and assumption of perpetual availability, which even incentivises many people to remain with the platform or continue to use it in order to review their saved content," she informed journalists. "But these are not altruistic protectors of private remembrance."